The American Psychiatric Association (APA) has updated its Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, including with new information specifically addressed to individuals in the European Economic Area. As described in the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, this website utilizes cookies, including for the purpose of offering an optimal online experience and services tailored to your preferences.

Please read the entire Privacy Policy and Terms of Use. By closing this message, browsing this website, continuing the navigation, or otherwise continuing to use the APA's websites, you confirm that you understand and accept the terms of the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, including the utilization of cookies.

×
INFORMATION ON THE CANDIDATESFull Access

Candidate for Area 1 Trustee

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1176/pn.37.23.0032

About the Candidate

Jack S. Brandes, M.D., Ph.D.

Fellow, 1970

•. 

Full-Time Private Practice, 1986- ; University Health Network, Toronto General Hospital, Associate Staff, 1986-

•. 

Assistant Professor of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, 1974-

•. 

Ontario District Branch: Deputy Representative, 1981-85; Representative, 1985-88, 2001- ; Legislative Representative, 1988-

•. 

Member, APA Nominating Committee, 1993-94

•. 

International Advisor to DSM-IV, 1990-93

•. 

Ontario Medical Association, Section on Psychiatry: Member, 1984-90; Chair, 1986-88

Candidate’s Views

APA has several critical matters to address:

Deprofessionalization

Burgeoning demands for mental health care in America coupled with the helping attitudes and openness of the professional psychiatric community have led to the downloading and outright transfer of many aspects of diagnosis, treatment, and rehabilitation to nonphysicians. Social workers, psychologists, mental health care workers, HMOs, and drug companies not only have stepped into the breach but also have demanded greater scopes of practice for themselves. Yet, psychiatrists are left with the burden of legal and ethical accountability for the care of patients. Psychiatrists need to show effectively how our skills, training, and experience qualify us for the authority to make clinical decisions so that we can continue to accept the professional accountability expected of us. I regard this as a major task for the years ahead.

Fragmentation

One response to the loss of professional status and the invasion of “competitors” into our field has been to take refuge in practice niches that seem to allow us to retain a sense of authority in order to cope with our considerable burden of accountability. This has led to an estrangement between practitioners who discover themselves split into factions: town and gown, researcher and clinician, inpatient and outpatient psychiatrists, doctors of the brain and doctors of the mind, managers and the managed. APA has suffered losses because of this divisiveness. We need to rejoin one another and learn to value our collective contributions to patient care.

Demoralization

Psychiatry and its major organizations continue to struggle with the ethical dilemmas resulting from the restrictive and inadequate treatment options created by profit-driven managed “care.” As a consequence, we are becoming transformed from professionals into workers with accountabilities that no similar group faces! Other professions challenge psychiatry’s basic entitlement to treat both body and mind. As a result, our members are often discouraged, professionally disenfranchised, and unsupported, leading to increased stress and demoralization. APA needs to provide leadership and support in these areas in order to regain the trust and allegiance of its members.

Over the years, APA has reached out and supported the development of marginalized members of our profession and groups representing both our patients and the public at large. APA has lobbied for better insurance coverage and nondiscriminatory access to treatment. These efforts continue to be important and valuable. Now we must address the state of the profession lest we cease to function as one.

I am honored to be asked to stand for election as Area 1 trustee. My involvement in APA in both my district branch and the Assembly has given me a clear understanding of the difficulties and tasks that we all face. As a Canadian and member of a smaller district branch in Area 1, I have had the opportunity to participate in the struggles faced by two health care systems and to contribute to the position of medicine and psychiatry. I can understand the difficulties we face and act to ameliorate them.

Thank you for your consideration. Exercise your right to vote!

Primary Loci of Work and Sources of Income

Work:

    100%—Private practice of psychiatry

Income:

    100%—Private practice of psychiatry