A national survey of psychiatrists and other physicians found that most of
them support inclusion of a government-funded option in any legislative effort
to overhaul the existing health care system dominated by the private health
The summer-long survey, to which 2,130 physicians responded, asked them
which of three options for expanding health insurance coverage they supported
the most: combining public and private options, expanding access to private
options only, or covering everyone through a single public plan like Medicare
does. A substantial majority of physicians (62.9 percent) said they supported
a combination of public and private insurance plans.
The survey was conducted by Salomeh Keyhani, M.D., M.P.H., an assistant
professor of medicine at Mount Sinai School of Medicine, and Alex Federman,
M.D., M.P.H., an assistant professor of general internal medicine also at
Mount Sinai. The findings were published in the September 14 New England
Journal of Medicine.
While 27.3 percent of physicians said their first option was a system based
on private insurance options, only 9.6 percent of respondents supported a
reform plan that relied solely on a government-funded insurance, such as a
nationwide expansion of Medicare. However, 58.3 percent of the physician
respondents supported an expansion of Medicare to Americans as young as age
While the survey report did not disclose the number of psychiatrists who
participated, the authors pointed out that responses were consistent across
physician specialties, practice settings, and regions of the country.
"Regardless of their preferred solution, the majority of APA members
would want to see parity principles recognized, appropriate physician
reimbursement, and voluntary participation in any reform plans that emerge
from Congress," said Irvin "Sam" Muszynski, J.D., director
of APA's Office of Healthcare Systems and Financing.
In September APA's Board of Trustees voted unanimously to support America's
Affordable Health Choices Act (HR 3200) as the basis for health care reform
(see APA Board Takes Stance on Health Reform Proposals). That
bill—approved by three House of Representatives committees and
previously endorsed by the AMA and other groups—includes the most
aggressive government-funded insurance program, or public option, of the major
health reform bills advancing through Congress.
The APA Board's support was based in part on the bill's requirement that
its proposed Health Insurance Exchange feature include the option of a public
health insurance program. The bill clarifies that physician participation in a
public plan would be voluntary and that no penalties may be levied against
physicians who choose not to participate.
The survey and the APA Board's actions came as the Obama administration and
its allies explicitly called for physicians to help educate their patients
about the need for a health system overhaul and how it could benefit them.
"It's especially important that we have doctors speaking up in their
communities for the change that our health system needs," said Vivek
Murthy, president of Doctors for America, a liberal advocacy group, during a
September 17 White House conference call for physicians.
Previous surveys on physicians' views of health reform proposals asked
about somewhat different national health insurance questions and received
varying answers. One survey of 1,650 physicians published in the November 2003
Annals of Internal Medicine found, for example, that 49 percent of
physicians supported legislation to establish national health insurance, but
only 26 percent supported a federally funded national health insurance plan. A
majority of psychiatrists in that survey supported national health insurance,
but less than 50 percent of them backed the federal government as the sole
payer of national health insurance.
"Doctors on Coverage—Physicians' Views of a New Public
Insurance Option and Medicare Expansion" is posted at<http://healthcarereform.nejm.org/?p=1790>.▪