Then, eight weeks later, using television imagery and newspaper reports about the September 11 attacks, they studied the same subjects again. But this time, half of the subjects were exposed to fear-inducing media reports, and half were exposed to anger-inducing media reports. The researchers found that the fear-inducing media reports increased subjects’ perceptions that they might be hurt in terrorist attacks—that is, made them more pessimistic, whereas the anger-inducing media reports decreased subjects’ perception of personal risk—that is, made them more optimistic.