0
61
Psychiatric News   |   January 02, 2004 
Volume 39 Number 1 page 2-2
Government News
  • Print
  • E-mail
    Recipient(s) will receive an email with a link (good for 72 hours) to 'Psychiatrist Sues State Medicaid Plan Over Prior-Authorization Requirement' and do not need to have Psychiatric News account to access the content.
    Example: John Doe
    CC Me:
    Enter your valid email address. Example: jdoe@example.com
    Separate multiple email address with semi-colons (up to 5).
    's Psychiatric News: 'Psychiatrist Sues State Medicaid Plan Over Prior-Authorization Requirement'
    Subject for your email.
    (Optional, message will truncate at 1000 characters)
    Copyright © in the material you requested is held by The American Psychiatric Association (unless otherwise noted). This email ability is provided as a courtesy, and by using it you agree that you are requesting the material solely for personal, non-commercial use, and that it is subject to The American Psychiatric Association's Terms of Use. The information provided in order to email this topic will not be used to send unsolicited email, nor will it be furnished to third parties. Please refer to The American Psychiatric Association's Privacy Policy for further information.
    Copyright © American Psychiatric Association. All rights reserved.
  • Share
  • Reprints
Psychiatrist Sues State Medicaid Plan Over Prior-Authorization Requirement
text A A A
View Disclosures and Other Information
Tired of interference in treatment decisions by his state’s Medicaid agency, a psychiatrist wants a court to grant him the ability to treat patients with all the tools at his command.
A Massachusetts psychiatrist has asked a state court to allow him to treat his Medicaid patients using the same standards and decision-making procedures he uses for other people he treats.
George Sigel, M.D., of Norwood, Mass., filed suit in August against the Massachusetts Medicaid program contending that its prior-authorization requirement for several psychiatric drugs is an illegal form of discrimination against patients insured through that program.
While on the books for 17 years, a rule requiring prior authorization for a group of psychoactive medications was ignored by state Medicaid officials until last May, Sigel told Psychiatric News. "It really hit us hard because [the move to enforce the policy] unfolded so dramatically," he said.
Beginning in May, some antidepressants required prior authorization, and starting in June all antipsychotics except risperidone fell into this category (Psychiatric News, May 16, 2003).
Patients who tried to fill prescriptions for these drugs ran into a roadblock at their pharmacy, forcing them to return to their doctor before a pharmacist could dispense the prescribed medication, said Sigel. He is program director for the South Boston Behavior Health Program, an outreach program of the New England Medical Center.
"Patient advocates starting getting very nervous" about the obstacles in getting psychiatric medications, and their lobbying convinced the state program to delete the antipsychotics from the preauthorization requirement. It did, however, leave in place the Food and Drug Administration’s (FDA) dose guidelines, thus prohibiting "off-label dosing," he noted.
The governor soon decided that the dosing restrictions for these drugs "made no sense," Sigel said, and instructed the agency to remove them.
While he viewed this as a positive step, Sigel noted that "the problems continued regarding access to mood stabilizers and some, but not all, antidepressants." The problem with the mood-stabilizer rule, he said, is that a physician cannot prescribe that class of drug for any "off-label" use without preauthorization from Massachusetts Medicaid.
For example, Sigel said that he has "at least 13 patients on Neurontin, and though the patients are pleased with their response," when he requests preauthorization to prescribe the drug, "in most instances [Massachusetts Medicaid] denies it because the use is not FDA approved."
Most of his patients are suffering from chronic and persistent mental illness and have their care paid for through Medicaid, he pointed out.
His decision to sue the agency was made much easier when he witnessed the dichotomy of reactions his patients exhibited when told about the preauthorization rules. Medicaid patients "would suddenly tense up" when they realized it was unlikely the program would cover the cost of their medication, Sigel said.
"I decided that this [policy] was a totally unnecessary intrusion into the doctor-patient relationship, and it was forcing me perilously close to committing malpractice," he stated.
He also maintained in his court filing that these restrictions—which affect how he treats one category of his patients—forces him to discriminate against them in violation of the Massachusetts and federal constitutions.
Sigel, who is acting as his own lawyer, had asked the court to grant injunctive relief, a request the judge denied, citing the absence of a danger of immediate harm to patients. He is now waiting for the judge to decide whether his filing has sufficient merit that it can proceed to the discovery phase, in which he can obtain relevant documentation from state officials.
Sigel has not received financial help from any professional or advocacy organizations. ▪

Interactive Graphics

Video

NOTE:
Citing articles are presented as examples only. In non-demo SCM6 implementation, integration with CrossRef’s “Cited By” API will populate this tab (http://www.crossref.org/citedby.html).
Compression-Only CPR: Pushing the Science Forward
Cone
AAM 2010;304:1493-1495.
All you need to read in the other general jounals
BMJ 2010;341:c5893-c1494.
Submit a Comments
Please read the other comments before you post yours. Contributors must reveal any conflict of interest.
Comments are moderated and will appear on the site at the discertion of JBJS editorial staff.

* = Required Field
(if multiple authors, separate names by comma)
Example: John Doe



Similar Articles
PSYCHIATRIC NEWS
Articles
Medicaid Savings Illusory as Hospitalizations Increase
Psychiatric News 2 September 2011: Vol. 46. no. 17, pp. 15-30
Facts About New Oregon Law
Psychiatric News 5 August 2011: Vol. 46. no. 15, pp. 12-12
DB Says Governor's Order Jeopardizes MH Care
Psychiatric News 17 December 2010: Vol. 45. no. 24, pp. 2-2
Health Care Law May Reduce MH Benefits in Medicaid
Psychiatric News 5 November 2010: Vol. 45. no. 21, pp. 1-37
[+] View More
Copyright ©
American
Psychiatric
Association