Autism is more prevalent than it was a few years ago, epidemiological
studies have revealed. But does an increased prevalence also mean an increase
in autism incidence—in short, an "autism epidemic"?
Probably not, Judith Grether, Ph.D., a research scientist with the
California Department of Health Services in Oakland, reported at an Autism
Society of America conference in 2001. She and her colleagues found that
between 1987 and 1994 the number of children in California diagnosed with
autism increased, yet there was a comparable decrease in the number of
children diagnosed with mental retardation of no known cause.
"So there was probably a shift in diagnosis during those years, not
an increase in autism," she said (Psychiatric News, September
Now Canadian psychiatrist Eric Fombonne, M.D., a professor of psychiatry at
McGill University, and a British developmental pediatrician, Suniti
Chakrabarti, M.D., former director of the Child Development Center in
Stafford, England, have come to a similar conclusion.
Results of their study appeared in the June American Journal of
During the past four years or so, studies focusing not just on autism, but
on the whole spectrum of pervasive developmental disorders have yielded a
prevalence rate of about 60 per 10,000 children. One of these studies was
conducted by Fombonne and Chakrabarti on about 16,000 children born in
Stafford from 1992 to 1995. They found a prevalence rate of 63 per 10,000. So
they decided to repeat their study in the same geographic area using the same
study design, but on a more recent birth cohort to see whether the prevalence
rate had changed since their first investigation. If the prevalence rate
turned out to be higher than before, they reasoned, it would suggest an
increase in the incidence of the disorders.
In this study, they focused on some 11,000 children born in Stafford from
1996 to 1998. As in their previous study, children were scrutinized for
pervasive developmental disorders in four stages. The stages were (1) an
initial screening of the target population and referral of children with
developmental or behavioral problems; (2) an assessment of referred children
by a developmental pediatrician or a child development team, leading to the
identification of children with moderate or severe developmental problems or
unsatisfactory progress; (3) a two-week multidisciplinary assessment and
medical investigation of those children found to have moderate or severe
developmental or behavioral problems or unsatisfactory progress, leading to
the identification of those suspected of having a pervasive developmental
disorder; (4) assessment of those suspected of having a pervasive
developmental disorder with standard diagnostic instruments such as the Autism
Diagnostic Interview—Revised and the Wechsler Preschool and Primary
Scale of Intelligence.
Diagnoses were made using DSM-IV criteria for autistic disorder
and other pervasive developmental disorders.
This evaluation process led to the identification of 27 children with a
pervasive developmental disorder not otherwise specified, 24 children with
autistic disorder, 12 children with Asperger's disorder, and one child with
childhood disintegrative disorder. Thus, a diagnosis of a pervasive
developmental disorder was confirmed in 64 children, yielding a combined
prevalence of pervasive developmental disorders of 59 per 10,000.
The researchers then compared this study and their previous one on five
diagnostic categories—pervasive disorder not otherwise specified,
autistic disorder, Asperger's disorder, childhood disintegrative disorder, and
all pervasive developmental disorders. They found no significant differences
between the two samples in any of these categories.
"If the prevalence figure for our new sample had increased from that
in the previous study, that might have pointed toward an increase in the
incidence of pervasive developmental disorders, consistent with the various
claims of an `epidemic of autism,'" the researchers wrote in their study
report. "We did not find such an increase, and there was no statistical
difference between the two prevalence rates, not even a trend in that
direction. It can therefore be safely concluded that, in this area and for
children born over the period 1992 and 1998, there was no evidence of a...
change in the incidence of pervasive developmental disorders."
Their follow-up study also revealed a marked lowering of the age of
referral for, and diagnosis of, pervasive developmental disorders since the
first study. "We were pleased to see that," Fombonne told
Psychiatric News, "because earlier referral and diagnosis offer
opportunities for earlier intervention, and studies have also demonstrated the
efficacy of early intervention."
Their survey was financed by the First Community Health Trust and the South
Staffs Healthcare National Health Service Trust.
The study, "Pervasive Developmental Disorders in Preschool
Children: Confirmation of High Prevalence," is posted online at<http://ajp.psychiatryonline.org/cgi/content/full/162/6/1133>.▪
Am J Psychiatry20051621133