Patients with schizophrenia and bipolar disorder lose as much as 20 years
off their average life expectancy compared with similar individuals in the
general population without serious mental illness. According to a report from
the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention released in April, the leading
cause of death contributing to that shortened lifespan is not the patients'
mental illness, but rather something largely preventable: cardiovascular
disease.
These statistics and others were cited by an expert panel as indirect
evidence that the fi eld of psychiatry is earning a failing grade when it
comes to managing medical comorbidity in patients with schizophrenia and
bipolar disorder—especially those patients who are taking
second-generation antipsychotics (SGAs). This class of drugs is generally
considered to be linked closely with increased risk of metabolic syndrome, a
leading risk factor for cardiovascular disease.
The panel of experts, chaired by John Newcomer, M.D., a professor of
psychiatry, psychology, and medicine at Washington University School of
Medicine in St. Louis, held a press briefing at APA's 2006 annual meeting in
May to issue the "Call to Action: Raising the Standard of Care in the
Treatment of Schizophrenia and Bipolar Disorder."
"The good news about this is that we know a lot about the prevention
of cardiovascular disease," said Newcomer, who also chairs APA's
Subcommittee on Antipsychotics and Metabolic Risk. "The bad news is that
the risk factors—the well-established risk factors for cardiovascular
disease in this population—are generally occurring at very high levels.
These risk factors are not being monitored and are not being attended to in
this population."
Newcomer's point was supported by a series of nearly 50 new research
presentations on the issue of metabolic syndrome and serious mental illness
during the annual meeting. Among those presentations was an analysis of
baseline data from the National Institute of Mental Health's CATIE trial
(Clinical Antipsychotic Trials of Intervention Effectiveness). That analysis
revealed that large percentages of patients who enrolled in the 18-month
comparative treatment study already had comorbid disorders that significantly
increased their risk for cardiovascular disease, even before receiving any
study medications. (The average patient in CATIE had been diagnosed 14 years
before entering the study and had taken numerous antipsychotics
previously.)
"I think this is probably the single most important finding in the
CATIE study," noted Henry Nasrallah, M.D., a professor of psychiatry,
neurology, and neuroscience at the University of Cincinnati College of
Medicine and a CATIE investigator. CATIE allowed investigators to determine"
to what degree patients were at high risk when they entered CATIE, and
what happened to them when they received certain antipsychotics within the
CATIE [protocol]."
Results from CATIE largely confirmed what other studies have reported over
the last five to seven years, Nasrallah said. "Some antipsychotics
worsened the [patients'] metabolic condition, and other [medications] helped
them by lowering their weight, lowering [blood glucose levels], and lowering
their lipids."
Somewhat surprising, Nasrallah said, was the finding that 42 percent of the
1,460 patients initially enrolled in CATIE met criteria for metabolic
syndrome. Metabolic syndrome is a constellation of signs and symptoms that
taken together signal a significantly increased risk of death by
cardiovascular disease (see
box).
However, Nasrallah reported at the press briefing and in a new research
poster presentation that these were the truly troubling findings: 45.3 percent
of the patients who had diabetes when they initially enrolled in CATIE were
not receiving any treatment to help control their blood glucose levels; 89.4
percent of the patients who had hyperlipidemia at baseline were not taking a
statin medication to lower blood lipid levels; and 62.4 percent of the
patients who met criteria for hypertension at baseline were not receiving
antihypertensive pharmacotherapy.
Similar data were presented at APA's annual meeting by John Kane, M.D.,
chief of psychiatry at Zucker Hillside Hospital/Long Island Jewish
Medical Center. Kane is participating in a large international study,
funded by Pfizer, that is examining the cardiovascular safety profile of
Pfizer's Geodon brand of ziprasidone, compared with olanzapine (Eli
Lilly and Co.'s Zyprexa). The study, the "Ziprasidone Observational
Study of Cardiac Outcomes," is being led by Brian Strom, M.D., M.P.H.,
the director of the Center for Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics
at the University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine. The study has
enrolled more than 17,000 patients with schizophrenia who have been
randomly assigned to receive either ziprasidone or olanzapine. Multiple
cardiovascular outcomes will be assessed to determine whether or not the
cardiovascular safety profiles of the two medications differ.
At baseline, 19 percent of zODIAC patients had hypertension, and 16 percent
met criteria for hyperlipidemia, yet less than 3 percent were taking any
antihypertensive or statin medications. Nearly two-thirds of the patients met
criteria for obesity, and 8.3 percent had diabetes.
"Clearly," Nasrallah said at the press briefing, "our
patients with schizophrenia are subject to double jeopardy, as I like to call
it. On the one hand, they have a high risk of metabolic disorders that shorten
their lives and cause early heart disease. On the other hand, they are not
getting appropriate and necessary treatment" for these problems.
Nasrallah believes the most significant factor underlying the lack of
treatment for cardiovascular risk factors in patients with serious mental
illness is clinicians' failure to identify and monitor metabolic adverse
effects.
"Are psychiatrists actually checking their patients at
baseline?" Nasrallah asked. "Do they measure and follow their
patients' obesity, their hypertension, their hyperglycemia and
hyperlipidemia?"
In February 2004, APA joined with the American Diabetes Association in
issuing a consensus statement calling for standardized monitoring of metabolic
adverse effects associated with the use of SGAs (Psychiatric News,
March 5, 2004). It was also endorsed by the American Association of Clinical
Endocrinologists and the North American Association for the Study of
Obesity.
The statement included a summary review of evidence showing that not all
six of the SGAs appeared to be equally associated with metabolic adverse
events and recommended specific laboratory tests that should start at
baseline, prior to the patients' first dose of antipsychotic medication, and
continue at regular intervals through the first five years of antipsychotic
therapy.
Based on data from several studies presented at APA's annual meeting, it
appears that less than 10 percent of patients on the medications are being
monitored using the APA/ADA consensus protocol.
New research presented at APA's 2006 annual meeting by Brian Cuffel, Ph.D.,
and Antony Loebel, M.D., of Pfizer revealed that after release of the APA/ADA
consensus statement, only 6 percent to 8 percent of patients in their study
taking SGAs completed the recommended baseline evaluation of serum lipid
levels along with follow-up measurement three months after initiation of
antipsychotic therapy. Similarly, only 16 percent to 23 percent of patients
underwent recommended baseline and follow-up serum glucose testing.
To see whether baseline monitoring and follow-up of patients improved after
the release of the consensus statement, Cuffel and Loebel compared data on
21,848 patients before the statement's release and 8,166 patients six months
afterward. The researchers were surprised to find little improvement. While
baseline monitoring was more common than follow-up, monitoring rates actually
declined after antipsychotic treatment was initiated.
The obvious disconnect between recommended monitoring of serious adverse
events and what actually occurs with patients taking antipsychotics is of"
growing concern," Newcomer said.
"The good news is, there are efforts now under way" to educate
doctors about the importance of monitoring, he added. "And there's a
sort of groundswell of interest" in making sure recommended monitoring
is performed appropriately.
The APA Subcommittee on Antipsychotics and Metabolic Risk, Newcomer added,
will soon issue a white paper summarizing SGAs' differential metabolic risk
and the monitoring protocols that should help to prevent or reduce serious
adverse events. In addition, the National Association of State Mental Health
Program Directors recently held a policy meeting and will issue a report
soon.
Finally, Nasrallah noted, increasing evidence indicates that initial
impressions of differential adverse effects among the SGAs exist. "There
are antipsychotics that are completely metabolically weight-neutral,
lipid-neutral, and glucose-neutral. There are other antipsychotics that
significantly increase [all three]. We need to match the patient with the drug
and get the safest medication for patients who are at the highest
risk"
Newcomer agreed. "This is a variable that psychiatrists are
potentially in a position to control." ▪