0
61
Psychiatric News   |   January 01, 2010 
Volume 45 Number 1 page 1-6
Government News
  • Print
  • E-mail
    Recipient(s) will receive an email with a link (good for 72 hours) to 'ECT Device Reclassification Raises Access Concerns' and do not need to have Psychiatric News account to access the content.
    Example: John Doe
    CC Me:
    Enter your valid email address. Example: jdoe@example.com
    Separate multiple email address with semi-colons (up to 5).
    's Psychiatric News: 'ECT Device Reclassification Raises Access Concerns'
    Subject for your email.
    (Optional, message will truncate at 1000 characters)
    Copyright © in the material you requested is held by The American Psychiatric Association (unless otherwise noted). This email ability is provided as a courtesy, and by using it you agree that you are requesting the material solely for personal, non-commercial use, and that it is subject to The American Psychiatric Association's Terms of Use. The information provided in order to email this topic will not be used to send unsolicited email, nor will it be furnished to third parties. Please refer to The American Psychiatric Association's Privacy Policy for further information.
    Copyright © American Psychiatric Association. All rights reserved.
  • Share
  • Reprints
ECT Device Reclassification Raises Access Concerns
Jun Yan
text A A A
View Disclosures and Other Information
©
American Psychiatric Association
Abstract

APA supports a Class II reclassification for ECT devices to ensure that patients who need ECT treatment can continue to receive the most effective and rapid treatment for depression.

Abstract Teaser
The Food and Drug Administration's (FDA's) pending decision on the reclassification of electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) devices may significantly affect patient access to the effective and potentially life-saving treatment for severe depression.
According to the 1976 amendments to the federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, medical devices must be proven safe and effective in clinical trials, and the data must be submitted, reviewed, and approved by the FDA before the devices can be marketed. Devices that were on the market before 1976, including ECT devices, were given a Class III designation and allowed to continue to be sold without going through the premarketing approval process. In April 2009, the FDA issued an order to require manufacturers of devices that had not been formally reviewed, including ECT devices, to submit clinical data to support the products' efficacy and safety.
In a notice published in the Federal Register on September 10, 2009, the FDA opened a docket to obtain public comments on how ECT devices should be reclassified.
"Based on the extensive body of evidence in the medical literature on the safety and efficacy of ECT, we support the reclassification of ECT to Class II, so that this important treatment remains available to the patients who need it," Sarah Lisanby, M.D., told Psychiatric News. Lisanby is the chair of the APA Task Force on ECT and director of the Division of Brain Stimulation and Therapeutic Modulation and a professor of clinical psychiatry at Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons. "At present, the FDA is requesting public comment on this matter, and we feel it is important for psychiatrists, patients, families, and all individuals whose lives are affected by the medical conditions that ECT treats to express their views about the importance of ECT in clinical practice."
APA has published two editions of an evidence-based report on ECT guidelines, in which research on the efficacy and safety of the therapy was thoroughly reviewed. A new edition is currently being prepared by the task force and expected to be released next year. Given the evidence of their therapeutic value, APA believes ECT devices should have the Class II designation, which still requires special controls for their use but does not significantly hamper patients' access to the treatment.
If, however, the FDA determines that ECT devices carry high safety risks relative to efficacy and maintains a Class III designation, manufacturers are required to submit a premarket approval application for each ECT device and await agency review and approval. Small manufacturers that currently produce these devices may not be able to afford the cost of the development and submission process and cease to sell ECT devices altogether, Jennifer Tassler, J.D., APA's deputy director of regulatory affairs in the Department of Government Relations, told Psychiatric News.
Anti-ECT advocates have been pushing for a Class III designation, which could drastically limit the availability of ECT devices that are currently on the market or will be marketed in the future, according to Tassler. She noted that APA, along with experts on the APA Task Force on ECT, have been communicating with the FDA on this matter. Extensive documentation, including evidence from decades of clinical experience and scientific research, has been submitted to the FDA to support the safety and efficacy of ECT devices when they are used appropriately and correctly to treat certain patients.
Since November 2009, APA has posted an alert on the Association's Web site, encouraging members to write to the FDA and support a Class II designation for ECT devices. The alert is posted at <www.psych.org/MainMenu/AdvocacyGovernmentRelations/GovernmentRelations/AdvocacyActionCenter/Current-Alerts.aspx>. A form letter for members' use can be downloaded at <www.psych.org/Departments/DGR/holdingfolder/Letter-on-ECT-Reclassification-11-2-09.aspx>.
The Federal Register notice is posted at <www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/home.html#documentDetail?R=0900006480a20202>. The public can comment through January 8 at <www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/home.html#submitComment?R=0900006480a20202>.blacksquare[XSLExtension]

Interactive Graphics

Video

NOTE:
Citing articles are presented as examples only. In non-demo SCM6 implementation, integration with CrossRef’s “Cited By” API will populate this tab (http://www.crossref.org/citedby.html).
Compression-Only CPR: Pushing the Science Forward
Cone
AAM 2010;304:1493-1495.
All you need to read in the other general jounals
BMJ 2010;341:c5893-c1494.
Submit a Comments
Please read the other comments before you post yours. Contributors must reveal any conflict of interest.
Comments are moderated and will appear on the site at the discertion of JBJS editorial staff.

* = Required Field
(if multiple authors, separate names by comma)
Example: John Doe



Similar Articles
PSYCHIATRIC NEWS
Articles
When Ethical Lines Were Crossed in Service to the Nation
Psychiatric News 17 June 2011: Vol. 46. no. 12, pp. 16-33
FDA Advisory Panel Favors ECT in High-Risk Category
Psychiatric News 4 March 2011: Vol. 46. no. 5, pp. 1-31
Consent Process Said Crucial at Each ECT-Treatment Step
Psychiatric News 16 July 2010: Vol. 45. no. 14, pp. 6-25
Med Check
Psychiatric News 2 July 2010: Vol. 45. no. 13, pp. 25-25
[+] View More
Copyright ©
American
Psychiatric
Association