The American Psychiatric Association (APA) has updated its Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, including with new information specifically addressed to individuals in the European Economic Area. As described in the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, this website utilizes cookies, including for the purpose of offering an optimal online experience and services tailored to your preferences.

Please read the entire Privacy Policy and Terms of Use. By closing this message, browsing this website, continuing the navigation, or otherwise continuing to use the APA's websites, you confirm that you understand and accept the terms of the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, including the utilization of cookies.

×
Letter to the EditorFull Access

Accuracy Needed

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1176/pn.36.23.0041a

I’ve just read the Residents’ Forum in the October 19 issue by Dr. Craig B.H. Surman, titled “Training During Terror and Trauma.”

His column moved me to pick up pen to comment that the diagnostic criteria for posttraumatic stress disorder are being misused. The news media, including trained physicians who were interviewed, continually referred to those at ground zero as suffering from “posttraumatic stress disorder.” Much to my chagrin, these news reports were well within 30 days of the terrorist attacks, thus requiring a diagnosis of acute stress disorder, versus posttraumatic stress disorder.

I think that in light of the long-range situation that we are facing in this country with regard to potentially more terrorist attacks, a distinction needs to be made (perhaps an article needs to be done) explaining the difference between posttraumatic stress and an acute stress reaction or disorder. This is certainly something that many of us, unfortunately, will be handling in our practices.

Fort Myers, Fla.