The American Psychiatric Association (APA) has updated its Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, including with new information specifically addressed to individuals in the European Economic Area. As described in the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, this website utilizes cookies, including for the purpose of offering an optimal online experience and services tailored to your preferences.

Please read the entire Privacy Policy and Terms of Use. By closing this message, browsing this website, continuing the navigation, or otherwise continuing to use the APA's websites, you confirm that you understand and accept the terms of the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, including the utilization of cookies.

×
Clinical & Research NewsFull Access

Johns Hopkins Scientists Retract Ecstasy Findings

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1176/pn.38.22.0027b

In the September 27, 2002, issue of Science, George Ricaurte, M.D., an associate professor of neurology at Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, and colleagues reported some startling findings about the party drug ecstasy.

They reported that they had found, in a handful of squirrel monkeys and baboons, that simply one night of using Ecstasy was capable of damaging the neurotransmitter serotonin or the neurotransmitter dopamine. “These findings suggest that humans who use repeated doses of MDMA [ecstasy] over several hours are at high risk for incurring severe brain dopaminergic neural injury (along with significant serotonergic neurotoxicity),” the investigators concluded in their study report (Psychiatric News, November 1, 2002).

Ricaurte and his coworkers have now retracted those findings in the “Letters to the Editor” section of the September 12 Science. They claim that the drug that they had injected into their experimental animals and that they believed was ecstasy was actually methamphetamine, and that the error occurred because the drug supplier had mixed up labels for the two substances.

The retraction is posted on the Web at www.sciencemag.org/cgi/reprint/301/5639/1479b.pdf.

Science 2003 301 1479