The American Psychiatric Association (APA) has updated its Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, including with new information specifically addressed to individuals in the European Economic Area. As described in the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, this website utilizes cookies, including for the purpose of offering an optimal online experience and services tailored to your preferences.

Please read the entire Privacy Policy and Terms of Use. By closing this message, browsing this website, continuing the navigation, or otherwise continuing to use the APA's websites, you confirm that you understand and accept the terms of the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, including the utilization of cookies.

×
Letters to the EditorFull Access

DB Ahead of Curve

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1176/pn.44.7.0024

In light of all the concern over issues around conflicts of interest in psychiatry, I would like to share a positive experience that I have had in my own district branch chapter.

Six years ago I became an officer of the Pittsburgh Psychiatric Society. At that time, we were presenting monthly CME programs that were largely funded by drug companies. I advocated that we wean ourselves from this funding and find alternative ways to pursue our educational goals.

The society gave my advocacy more than a respectful hearing: it took the suggestion to heart. We moved our meetings from a hotel meeting hall to conference rooms at cooperating local hospitals. We substituted sandwiches and bottled water for hot buffet meals and a bar. We eliminated most flown-in speakers and honoraria, and we brainstormed about how to present educational programs using our home-grown psychiatric talent (who were only sometimes the professors at our local academic centers). I and another forensic psychiatrist, for example, presented one such program, “When Your Patient Gets Arrested,” which we hosted at Allegheny County Jail, complete with tour!

Admittedly, we have had to cut down on the number of CME programs. Also, we spend some more of our chapter and state funds on our programs, and we still accept a small amount of industry funding. But overall, our chapter remains healthy, and our programs are still popular.

Our effort exemplifies a model for moving toward independence. I am proud that the Pittsburgh Psychiatric Society took these steps voluntarily before we were pushed to do so by public opinion or by restrictions that came to be imposed by the companies themselves.

Pittsburgh, Pa.