The American Psychiatric Association (APA) has updated its Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, including with new information specifically addressed to individuals in the European Economic Area. As described in the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, this website utilizes cookies, including for the purpose of offering an optimal online experience and services tailored to your preferences.

Please read the entire Privacy Policy and Terms of Use. By closing this message, browsing this website, continuing the navigation, or otherwise continuing to use the APA's websites, you confirm that you understand and accept the terms of the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, including the utilization of cookies.

×
Clinical & ResearchFull Access

Alzheimer’s Drug May Interfere With Blood-Clotting Cascade

Abstract

Amyloid protofibrils—the target of the Alzheimer’s drug lecanemab—can turn on the plasma contact system, which promotes blood vessel dilation and inflammation.

Image of blood cells
Getty Images/iStock/Thinkhubstudio

The approval by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) of lecanemab for the treatment of Alzheimer’s disease was celebrated earlier this year, as it was the first antibody therapy that was found to slow cognitive decline in patients. While this drug targets the amyloid-beta fragments that are a hallmark feature of Alzheimer’s disease, its exact mechanism of action is unknown.

Researchers at Rockefeller University in New York believe they have found evidence that lecanemab may work by disrupting amyloid-beta’s ability to activate a part of the body’s blood- clotting network known as the plasma contact system. They described these findings in a brief report in PNAS.

How Plasma Contact System Works

The plasma contact system involves a series of biochemical reactions that are triggered in response to nearby tissue damage. While the plasma contact system can induce some clotting, it mainly facilitates the clotting process by dilating blood vessels and activating the immune system, explained lead study author Erin Norris, Ph.D., a research associate professor at Rockefeller.

Norris and study co-author Sidney Strickland, Ph.D., the Zachary and Elizabeth M. Fisher Professor in Alzheimer’s and Neurodegenerative Disease at Rockefeller, have been researching the contact system for years. Previous research by the pair has suggested a relationship between the activation of the contact system and memory impairment in people with Alzheimer’s disease and mild cognitive dementia. In addition, an analysis of blood samples from Alzheimer’s patients demonstrated that amyloid-beta may be able to directly activate the contact system.

For this new study, Strickland, Norris, and colleagues set out to determine the specific type of amyloid-beta that triggers the contact system.

Many Faces of Amyloid-Beta

Amyloid-beta exists in four progressive configurations:

  • Monomers: free-floating protein fragments.

  • Oligomers: small clumps of monomers.

  • Protofibrils: rigid chains of oligomers.

  • Fibrils: insoluble nets of protofibrils.

While the fibril structures make up the plaques that are characteristic of Alzheimer’s, many researchers believe the protofibrils are the most toxic form of this molecule. For their analysis, the Rockefeller researchers created amyloid-beta structures of each type and added them to blood samples from healthy donors. They found that protofibrils were the only amyloid-beta form that activated the contact system.

electron microscopy slides of amyloid beta fragments of different sizes.

Alzheimer’s-associated amyloid-beta fragments can assemble into progressively larger structures. New research appearing in PNAS finds that the protofibrils are the only amyloid-beta form that can activate a pathway that triggers blood vessel dilation and inflammation. These protofibrils are also the same species targeted by lecanemab, the first Alzheimer’s therapy with some evidence of slowing cognitive decline.

Pradeep Singh, Rockefeller University

It was known that the amyloid-beta antibody lecanemab preferentially attaches to amyloid protofibrils, rendering them inert until they are broken down by white blood cells. When the Rockefeller researchers added lecanemab to the blood samples along with the protofibrils, they found that the contact system was no longer activated.

George Perry, Ph.D., the Semmes Foundation Distinguished University Chair in Neurobiology at the University of Texas at San Antonio, said the findings advance what researchers understand of the biology of amyloid-beta, but cautioned against extrapolating the results too far.

“These experiments were done using assemblies of pure amyloid,” he told Psychiatric News. In the living brain, amyloid structures assemble around other proteins and molecules.

Additionally, Perry said that the demonstrated interaction may not be clinically relevant, as researchers continue to debate whether amyloid-beta protofibrils are inherently toxic in living brains. As he and others have noted, these antibodies can clear significant amounts of amyloid-beta fragments from the brain, yet patients do not get better.

Strickland and Norris acknowledged that the latest findings do not offer definitive proof that lecanemab’s clinical benefits are via blocking the contact system. However, the findings may explain why lecanemab has lower rates of side effects such as brain edemas than the related amyloid drug aducanumab, which was controversially approved in 2021.

As noted, the contact system promotes blood vessel dilation, which in turn can increase the risk of localized brain swelling and/or bleeding. By breaking down protofibrils, lecanemab can reduce contact system activity and risks of bleeding.

Aducanemab targets amyloid oligomers, which according to this study appear to have no direct impact on the contact system. A third amyloid therapy awaiting FDA approval, docanemab, directly targets the large, insoluble amyloid fibrils. This drug has also shown higher rates of vascular side effects than lecanemab in clinical studies.

“There are so many things going wrong in Alzheimer’s disease, and contact system overactivation is just one small part,” said Norris, who has been working with Strickland on a diagnostic test to identify individuals with a dysregulated plasma contact system. “But if we can identify and address even one problem in a patient, that will help.”

This study was supported by grants from the National Institutes of Health along with the Robertson Therapeutic Development Fund, Samuel Newhouse Foundation, John A. Herrmann, and May and Samuel Rudin Family Foundation. ■